Feynman: How to think 1 of 2 FUN TO IMAGINE 11

What Hacker News said

Recommends joeyespo · 2011-07 · on “Accidental Genius: How To Think”

I completely agree. First started thinking this way after listening to Feynman talk about his discovery of how people think very differently. [this video] He does a great job of communicating this, despite our interpretive differences. (Though perhaps it's just very well spoken for my interpretation and just the opposite for someone else out there.)

Recommends Retric · 2012-03 · on “MIT discovers the location of memories: Individual neurons”

Perhaps if I reword that a little you might understand what I mean: [LINK] is the subjective experience of the ability to think about things and processes as abstractions. Apple, Airplane, Alphabet, Algebra, Balance, Self, or Obama they all exist as arrangements and connections of neurons in your brain. When a song is stuck in your head that's a physical thing that's happening to a some neurons in your head. But, so is everything else your thinking about. These networks also connect to and build off of other abstractions so ((((peanut) + butter) + Jelly) + Sandwich) is built from more than one of these networks. Try and think of a pile of peanut butter next to some grape jelly. No problem it

Recommends DavidVoid · 2018-04 · on “Kubrick found what he wanted by trying things out”

You'll probably enjoy this video with Richard Feynman about how different people think differently even for something as basic as counting. [this video]

Recommends chii · 2019-04 · on “Overview of differential equations [video]”

If you have a few minutes spare, you should watch this video of richard feynman, who talks about how he thinks "thinking" happens in people, and how communication is very lossy : [this video] i think the fact that you thought a certain way of learning is more appropriate is actually correct - some people learn one way better than another, and that's because in their brain, they model the world in a different way to other people (who also find a different way of learning better). It just so happens that sometimes a person's model happens to suit the sort of teaching method being used in a school, and he ends up looking like a genius.

Recommends oxplot · 2020-01 · on “Not everyone has an internal monologue”

Relevant bit from Feynman talking about how he found that a simple act of counting in one's head can be different and all its implications. I suggest watching the other videos from the same interview. Lots of fun. [this video]

Cites adamdecaf · 2011-06 · on “You don't understand something until you think it's obvious.”

This reminds me of a story from Feynman where he was with a math friend and they were trying to multi-task. Yet, they ended up going about the two things (counting for a minute while reading or speaking) in completely different ways. (Different enough that one could only count and talk while the other could only count and read.) [this video]

Cites JL2010 · 2011-07 · on “The Higgs Boson - A one page explanation”

And with that comment I'd like to share this: [this video] Physicist Richard Feynman describes an experience where he and a fellow student visualized the elementary concept of counting in different ways... "What we're really doing is having some big translation scheme going on where we're translating what this fellow says into our images."

Cites Jach · 2011-12 · on “Why Don’t We Value Spatial Intelligence?”

One problem is not everyone has imagination--just like there are some photo-memory people there are those with no capability of 'picturing' anything in their mind. Another is that people's mental imagery is probably very different, how can you teach it directly? If the school is good at getting people to discover that mental imagery on their own it will probably work out, but it's hard to teach it to someone who doesn't share it. (I'd love to see some other psychology studies on this, I think I first ran across the view from a Feynman video: [this video] )