George Carlin on Conspiracies
Why Hacker News recommends it
Quoted to argue that aligned elites act in concert without explicit collusion.
What it is
A one-minute George Carlin clip on conspiracies, making the point that powerful people with shared interests need no formal conspiracy.
Recommended by 0 HN commenters across 0 different months, 2023 to 2025.
What Hacker News said
Cites mabbo · 2023-07 · on ““Greedflation” is a nonsense idea”
A simpler explanation of 'greedflation' is simply that the lack of actual competition by market leaders in most consumer goods markets has lead to massive profits and higher prices, without increased wages. "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good" - a fantastic quote from a fun movie, but it can in fact be true too. If we use greed as a means to drive competitors in a market, competing against each other, resulting in them creatively undercutting one another, driving down prices so that they can sell the most, then the consumer wins out. But that isn't happening anymore. The largest corporations in each market have gained dominance through mergers, acquisitions, etc. They can reduce their
Cites richbell · 2023-11 · on “McDonald's, Chipotle increases prices after California raises fast-food min wage”
> What's being proposed is a grand conspiracy theory. That across most companies across all the states in the country they've all decided to be evil and greedy together... To quote the late George Carlin "you don't need a formal conspiracy when interests converge." [this video]
Cites godelski · 2023-12 · on “Harvard gutted team examining Facebook Files following $500M Zuckerberg donation”
There's a joke from a comedian I forget if it is L̶o̶u̶i̶s̶ ̶C̶K̶ George Carlin o̶r̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶. But basically is along the lines that you don't have explicitly collude when you all come from the same backgrounds. The interests are aligned already. It's pointing out that representatives need to actually be from representative populations of people. But he did it in a funny way, this comment really isn't. Edit: thanks lo_zamoyski. Here's a video: [this video]
Cites mandmandam · 2024-06 · on “Richard Stallman, su, and the 'wheel' group (2004)”
> I'm sure you didn't mean to imply it but the way your post is worded could be misunderstood as if you were saying that some powerful entity is trying to mute rms through defamation I said what I said, though, you should understand there doesn't need to be some 'entity' making dictates. Just powerful people whose interests align; who all went to the same schools, are in the same clubs, and have the same fucked up views [0]. 'Muting' isn't the word I'd use; I'd go with 'marginalize'. Close enough though. RMS' vision of free software is an existential threat to big tech, and to the ecosystem of mass surveillance they enable. Much as Assange's autism was weaponized to paint him as 'arrogant' i
Cites mandmandam · 2025-06 · on “The US is turning into a mass techno-surveillance state”
> When interests converge, formal conspiracies aren’t necessary. These people went to the same universities, joined the same fraternities, and sat on the same boards and country clubs. They share the same interests. They don’t need to call a meeting—they already know what’s good for them. - [this video]