Tesla Bot Update

Tesla · 5.2M views · 2023 · 1:06

Open on YouTube

Roboticsnewsnews

Why Hacker News recommends it

Referenced as evidence of Tesla's humanoid robot progress and its data collection efforts.

What it is

A one-minute Tesla clip showing multiple Tesla-built Optimus bots walking and learning about the real world.

Recommended by 0 HN commenters across 0 different months, 2023 to 2024.

What Hacker News said

Cites machdiamonds · 2023-07 · on “XAI”

- You've mentioned that Musk isn't good with cars, yet under his leadership, Tesla has emerged as the world's most valuable automaker. This seemingly contradicts the notion of Musk being inept in the automotive industry. - Your claim about Tesla's autonomous vehicles lagging behind competition appears misinformed. From what I understand, Tesla's self-driving technology, which does not rely on high-definition maps, is far advanced compared to most companies in the same space. Moreover, the self-driving team, led by Karpathy and now Ashok, are highly competent individuals. - To suggest that SpaceX hasn't been successful or valuable to NASA is just wrong. You label the Starship project as 'dumb

Cites modeless · 2024-01 · on “HaptX gloves provide high-fidelity touch feedback of virtual spaces”

These are too complex and expensive for consumer use now and for the foreseeable future. However there is an important application where these may end up being key: teleoperation of robot hands to produce training data for neural nets. We will probably need millions of hours of data of robots doing everyday tasks to train our neural net models. Collecting that data might mean humans puppeteering robots very precisely but also very quickly. Without haptic gloves, human operators would be attempting tasks with no sense of touch at all, and their movements would be unnatural and inefficient, ultimately resulting in the trained robot moving inefficiently too. Tesla has a motion capture suit that

Cites loceng · 2024-02 · on “Nvidia adds $277B in market value, Wall Street's largest one-day gain in history”

How about addressing and countering any of my specific points, ideally each one in sequence so you can't cherrypick to avoid the ones where I'm certainly correct - rather than what's essentially ad hominem as your response? [this video] [LINK] etc. Perhaps you're not thinking from first principles and extrapolating from there?