HN recommends it as a funny, accurate and easy primer on Keynesian versus Austrian views of the business cycle.
Topics › Business, Startups & Economics
The best microeconomics & behavioral economics videos, according to Hacker News
84 videos about microeconomics & behavioral economics that Hacker News commenters keep pointing each other to, ranked by how many separate months they were recommended. Part of Business, Startups & Economics.
HN recommends it as an 80-minute way to get the gist of the book and a different view of what money is.
HN commenters use it as a short introduction to anarcho-capitalist ideas about private law and how disputes could be resolved without a state.
HN regards it as a classic to revisit every few years for improving decisions and self-awareness.
HN commenters recommend it as an in-depth, accessible look at airline class economics and revisit it in many discussions about airlines.
HN people recommend it as a thought-provoking, wide-ranging case for the stagnation thesis, worth hearing even if you disagree with Thiel.
HN's go-to link for correcting the lightbulb conspiracy myth, giving an engineer's view of the lifespan versus efficiency tradeoff.
HN uses it in TPP and trade-deal threads as a clear example of ISDS being used by corporations against governments.
HN commenters share it as an accessible case for worker cooperatives and workplace democracy as a model for a modern left.
Go-to reference in lottery threads for the point that earmarked lottery revenue does not really add to school funding.
The go-to primary source in basic income threads for Friedman's negative income tax idea.
Recommended in greenwashing and offset threads as a well-sourced, detailed explanation of how offsets underdeliver.
HN commenters link it to argue for cooperation and engagement over isolation, and as an accessible statement of positive-sum thinking.
It is the go-to short primer HN commenters cite to explain why nuclear is expensive upfront but cheap to run once the construction debt is paid.
Recommended in tipping threads as a fast, entertaining, sourced case against tipping culture.
HN recommends it as the standard talk on how too many options lead to paralysis and second-guessing.
Commenters link it as the engaging go-to explainer on planned obsolescence and the lightbulb cartel.
HN commenters share it in union threads as a concise statement of the free-market economist's case against unions.
HN repeatedly cites it in any thread on why glasses are expensive, as the eye-opening explanation of Luxottica's monopoly.
HN people use it as a clear, quick explanation of Nash equilibrium and why competitors cluster.
Shared during inflation discussions as an accessible, layman-friendly statement of the monetarist view.
Recommended as a one-hour substitute for the book's opening chapters for those short on time.
HN points to it as a substantive debate on intellectual property from two libertarian angles, with Kinsella as the abolitionist voice.
HN commenters point to it as a detailed primer on why US healthcare is expensive and where the money goes.
HN commenters cite it whenever a thread touches on tax complexity, loopholes, or why companies like Intuit benefit from a convoluted tax system.
HN users share it as a short, accessible explainer for land value tax whenever housing, rents or inequality come up.
Frequently linked in threads on philanthropy, ethical consumption and billionaire giving as a short, approachable critique of charity.
Offered as a well-researched counterpoint in threads complaining about car dealerships and direct sales.
HN cites it whenever money as an incentive comes up, as evidence that rewards can backfire for creative white-collar work.
Cited in tuition-cost threads for the argument that easy government-backed loans enable high prices.
HN commenters share it as a counterargument to the YIMBY build-more-housing view, linking wealth concentration to asset prices.
HN recommends it as a quick video version of the classic essay on specialization and economic interdependence.
Pointed to as an in-depth view of how Valve is run and how Newell thinks about workers, management and customers.
HN points to it as a short, funny and genuinely informative take on economic principles such as trade and opportunity cost.
HN commenters point to it for Hanson's grabby aliens reasoning as an unusual framework for thinking about UFO behavior and intelligent life in the cosmos.
HN commenters link it as a clearer explanation of induced demand for people who have not studied the topic.
Commenters say it made market economics click for them and find it an interesting documentary relevant to welfare and UBI debates.
Cited as a thorough statement of the bitcoin-maximalist case, with the host pushing back.
Pointed to as the canonical concise case against pennies whenever coin abolition comes up.
Used to illustrate predictable irrationality, such as defaults and the effect of the middle option among three choices.
HN recommends it as an insightful catalog of the biases that drive bad decisions, and links it often in Munger memorials and self-improvement threads.
Pointed to as the best explanation of pre-decimal British money, including forgery and the guinea.
Linked repeatedly in threads on monopolies, protectionism, and subsidies, usually as a source for the argument that free markets are an ideology more than a reality.
HN commenters recommend it in threads on happiness and well-being as a clear account of why memory and experience of happiness diverge.
Pointed to as a concise explanation of land value tax and its effect on city finances.
Pointed to as a quick, readable summary of the data behind US healthcare costs.
HN commenters recommend it for Friedman's argument that regulation and lobbying produce a less efficient, centrally planned healthcare system.
It is cited in inequality and capitalism threads as a billionaire's critique of neoliberal market assumptions.
HN cites it for Ariely's finding that people cheat a little without feeling guilty.
HN refers to it as a chance to hear Shkreli's own side of the drug pricing story, including his claim that it is common practice.
HN uses it as a reference for Friedman's argument that generous welfare and open immigration are in tension.
HN commenters cite it as the quick, shareable illustration of hidden supply-chain complexity and decentralized knowledge, and bring it up in threads on AI, manufacturing and specialization.
HN cites it in discussions of occupational licensing and rent-seeking as a libertarian argument.
Pointed to in healthcare cost threads as an entertaining primer on how the US system inflates prices.
HN cites it in debates on wealth taxes, inheritance and inequality as Friedman's argument against redistribution.
HN uses it as the canonical illustration of decentralized production and global cooperation, often cited well outside economics threads.
HN cites it as the go-to example of how impossible it is to get prices in advance for US medical care.
HN cites it in threads on college admissions and affirmative action as Sowell's argument about unintended consequences.
Used to explain why contemporary art is expensive for money reasons rather than art reasons.
Cited in debates over pay equity law as Friedman's free-market argument on discrimination.
HN uses it as an example of cost-benefit reasoning about product safety in threads on recalls, security spending and Boeing.
HN mentions it occasionally as a source for Wolff's views, such as on worker co-ops, rather than as a widely recommended watch.
Brought up as a charming example of analog and liquid computers simulating a national economy.
Cited in game-economy threads as a clear explanation of why vendor-sellable loot causes hyperinflation and how designers counter it.
HN cites it as a fascinating explanation of a real Dutch auction, in threads about auctions and ticket sales.
HN commenters cite it as an interesting look at valuing human life, used in safety and liability discussions.
Pointed to as a good explanation of preference falsification and its effects on speech and politics.
HN uses it as shorthand for the innate human and primate sense of fairness in threads on pay, wealth and inequality.
HN commenters use it to show that even the best-known free-market economist supported putting a price on pollution.
HN links it as a concise explanation of why free parking is not really free and how parking rules shape cities.
Cited as a real-world experiment showing that banning investors did not lower purchase prices and may have raised rents.
Referenced when discussing how much time household technology saved families and how heavy housework used to be.
HN uses it as shorthand for post-scarcity economics, typically as a contrast to money-driven projects like crypto.
Used as a quick reference clip in capitalism and greed debates.
Linked in tipping debates as the classic argument against tipping culture.
HN commenters link it to illustrate Star Trek's moneyless economy in discussions of post-scarcity and the future.
HN commenters bring it up jokingly when a thread involves academic economics versus practical business.
Used as a go-to illustration of Goodhart's law and statistical manipulation in institutions.
Cited to argue that people do not know what they want and that markets should be segmented.
Mostly cited as a source for Sowell's views on welfare, neighborhoods and his personal anecdotes.
Mostly debated or criticized; one commenter found his points fair, while others questioned his climate views.
HN cites it in antitrust and regulation threads as Friedman's take on monopolies, sometimes approvingly and sometimes with skepticism.
Used as a shorthand illustration of juking the stats and Goodhart-style metric gaming.
HN cites it in tax and housing threads as a libertarian economist endorsing property or land taxes.
Which of these have you already seen?
Connect YouTube and HackerTube AI hides what you've watched and ranks the rest for you.