(405) Choosing a High Security Lock
Why Hacker News recommends it
HN users recommend it as an amusing, practical overview of padlocks from cheap to high security.
What it is
Lock-picking YouTuber Bill Johnson (BosnianBill) explains how to choose a high-security lock and why, showing examples and comparing designs. It covers what makes some padlocks more pick-resistant than others.
Recommended by 3 HN commenters across 3 different months, 2016 to 2017.
What Hacker News said
Recommends Zancarius · 2016-08 · on “Hacker Unlocks ‘High Security’ Electronic Safes Without a Trace”
Spend some time on bosnianbill's Youtube channel and you'll definitely get some tips. In particular, I'd recommend these videos: Buying Security: [LINK] Choosing a high Security Lock: [this video] (Be ware of about 2 minutes 30 seconds of sarcasm in the last one!) Otherwise, browse through the rest of his videos, skipping the challenge locks unless it's something that fascinates you: [LINK] Essentially, cheap locks can be bypassed very easily (almost anything by Masterlock). More expensive locks ($60+) will have more pins, making them harder to pick, and often have replaceable cores. Of course, security isn't just about the lock, which is addressed in the first video. Hope this gives you a starti
Recommends Animats · 2017-03 · on “The Document Which Used to Be Called the MIT Lockpicking Guide (1992)”
The top of the line in padlocks is the Sargent & Greenleaf 951 padlock, which is about $1300.[1] DoD uses these on weapons storage. Resists grinders, saws, liquid nitrogen, etc. Here's an amusing overview of available padlocks, starting with crap Master Locks and moving upward.[1] The ones that are hard to force or cut have large-diameter shackles, which probably won't fit a gym locker. [1] [this video]
Recommends javajosh · 2017-09 · on “Coding in the open: how to do it securely”
Some locks with open designs are difficult, or impossible to pick. In this amusing video this guy goes over details of different locks, and explains why they are not all created equal. [this video]