The Liquid Metal Battery: Innovation in stationary electricity storage
Why Hacker News recommends it
HN brings it up in energy storage threads as a promising scalable grid storage technology, and calls it worth the hour.
What it is
MIT's Donald Sadoway presents the liquid metal battery as a design for grid-scale stationary electricity storage, at an Imperial College London event in 2018. He covers the grid benefits of massive-scale storage.
Recommended by 3 HN commenters across 3 different months, 2019 to 2021.
What Hacker News said
Strong rec digibri · 2019-07 · on “Megapack: Utility-Scale Energy Storage”
This talk by Dr Sadoway is pretty amazing regarding his team's design for utility-scale liquid metal batteries: [this video] It's an hour long, but it's well worth the time investment. This is not merely a theoretical technology. A company has been created around this technology: [LINK] (I am not connected to any of this, but I am quite excited by it.)
Recommends lebuffon · 2021-04 · on “Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts”
I think this guy is onto something... Liquid metal batteries will be better than gravity storage IMHO. [this video] First commercial scale system is going live in 2021 so we shall see how it works out.
Recommends RobertoG · 2021-07 · on “Solar is dirt-cheap and about to get even more powerful”
We are probably using the wrong kind of battery for grid storage. There are some promising techs out there, like Liquid Metal Battery: [LINK] [this video]
Cites audunw · 2019-11 · on “Nuclear energy is a vital part of solving the climate crisis”
Grid level battery storage is very likely moving to other chemistries. The only reason to use lithium is that it's the chemistry that's the most developed right now, but lithium-ion batteries do not fundamentally speaking have the best properties for grid storage. Lithium-ion is great for energy density, but that's not a critical requirement for the grid. For grid storage I think molten metal makes the most sense. It's a technology that was developed to be ideal for grid storage from the start. Flow cell batteries might also make sense. And then there's other storage technologies like compressed air, pumped hydro, storing kinetic energy, storing thermal energy, etc. [LINK] [this video]
Cites audunw · 2019-11 · on “Nuclear energy is a vital part of solving the climate crisis”
> None of which scale well. There is a startup that has developed a battery that was designed from the start to scale as much as possible for grid level storage. [LINK] [this video] So far I've seen no reason to think that we won't be able to solve the energy storage challenges over the next 10-20 years. To be clear, I'm talking about smoothing out the power over hours and maybe days. If it's suddenly windless for a couple of weeks for some reason, there's no battery that will cover that. But we could just keep gas power plants around. They're great for that, and running them a few times a year is not gonna make a big dent in emissions. If they're used that rarely, we might even be able to use re