HN commenters repeatedly recommend it as the talk that finally made quantum mechanics click, especially for programmers.
Topics › Ideas, Learning & Language
The best scientific method & science communication videos, according to Hacker News
127 videos about scientific method & science communication that Hacker News commenters keep pointing each other to, ranked by how many separate months they were recommended. Part of Ideas, Learning & Language.
Heavily recommended as a masterpiece of popular science and the classic illustration of how fragile interdependent systems are, trotted out in every blackout or supply chain thread.
HN recommends it as career and research advice on choosing important problems and doing first-class work.
Linked in threads about meritocracy, careers and startups as a reminder that luck shapes who ends up on top.
HN commenters link it whenever a shaky study or the p<0.05 threshold comes up, as a short primer on false positives in science.
HN repeatedly cites it as an elegant, eye-opening explanation of fire and photosynthesis and as an example of Feynman's infectious love of knowledge.
HN commenters recommend it as the classic visualization for building intuition about scale, and it comes up whenever a thread concerns scale or size comparisons.
Widely recommended as one of the clearest, funniest short explanations of what makes something science.
HN recommends it as a gripping story of single-minded persistence against the herd, and as the back story behind modern LED lighting.
Recommended as a funny but depressing investigation, and the usual link in threads on predatory publishing and fake citations.
HN recommends it as a well-told chase of a weird fact that lands a rare interview with Lovelock at age 101.
Cited constantly as the name and example of the 'but sometimes' argument, where edge cases are used to resist better technology such as EVs and solar.
HN commenters point to it as an equation-free, charming way to hear Feynman explain physics to laypeople, including his famous refusal to explain magnetism with simple analogies.
Beloved as a humor masterpiece and often cited as required viewing on what not to do in an academic talk.
Recommended as a balanced take on AI and education, with the point that learning takes work that no technology can do for you.
HN commenters recommend the series as engaging, substantial physics with just enough math for non-specialists.
Pointed to in threads about cancer screening, PSA tests, full-body MRIs and consumer diagnostics as an explanation of why more testing can hurt.
HN returns to it as a model of intellectual honesty and good explanation, often linking it in discussions of why-questions and science communication.
The standard link whenever someone claims to be a visual learner or learning styles come up, with sources listed in the description.
HN recommends it as the full account of the lab mice issue and evolutionary tradeoffs between cancer and longevity, despite its length.
HN recommends it as a calm, evidence-based debunking whenever the Navy UFO videos come up.
HN recommends the series as a thoughtful account of engineering as rule-of-thumb problem solving that predates formal science.
Recommended as an engaging critique of string theory hype and its effect on public trust in physics, and often cited alongside Peter Woit's writing.
Recommended to people who find it inspiring or perspective-changing on pursuing goals, open-ended search and AI beyond optimization.
HN repeatedly recommends the series as a gripping account of scientific fraud, and cites it whenever research misconduct comes up.
Treated as the accessible reference on analog computing for neural nets, especially the Mythic AI segment.
HN commenters share it in vaccine threads as a quick, entertaining explanation of vaccination in layman's terms.
Commenters post it whenever a thread touches on soft sciences, replication problems, or what counts as real science.
Cited constantly as the classic answer to 'why' questions, on explanation, frames of reference and the limits of physics.
Recommended as an approachable entry point to quantum interpretations, and cited on many worlds questions.
Praised as a masterpiece of science education that recreates Faraday's demonstrations.
HN people recommend it as the capstone of Hamming's course and as career advice about working on important problems.
Recommended as a short, joyful example of Feynman's accessible way of explaining physics, which a transcript cannot capture.
HN regularly shares it in weight loss threads as a clear, precise explanation of the physics of weight loss.
HN regularly recommends Hamming's lecture series as a fascinating, wisdom-rich course on how to approach hard technical problems and a career, often preferred to the book.
HN commenters link it whenever the question of how the Earth's size was first measured comes up, calling it a wonderful explanation.
HN links it to correct the common misconception about dark matter and as a counterpoint to popular science coverage, though one commenter found it muddled.
Recommended as a clear explanation of where mass actually comes from.
Cited as a fun, experimental debunking of tonewood claims that shows electronics dominate electric guitar sound.
HN points people to it as a nuanced, medically informed take whenever Wim Hof breathing or cold plunges come up.
HN points to it as the sharpest, most-quoted critique of deep learning practice, and cites it whenever ML reliability or understanding is debated.
HN commenters recommend it as a methodical debunking of early lab-leak claims.
Recommended as a thorough debunking of Koko's supposed language ability in threads about animal communication.
Whenever NIST's pricey peanut butter or reference materials come up, commenters point to this as the clear explanation of why they exist.
HN points people to it as the explanation that finally made Fourier transforms and the FFT click, with a good historical story.
HN commenters recommend it as an entertaining and sophisticated primer on reading science reporting critically.
HN uses it as the go-to demonstration of how unintuitive mass conservation is, especially in weight loss and burning threads.
HN commenters call it the definitive, thorough answer to whether vaccines cause autism and recommend it as an entertaining deep dive.
HN returns to it constantly as a classic on the difficulty of explaining fundamentals and the limits of analogies.
Used as a short, well-made rebuttal to common global warming arguments in climate threads.
HN recommends it as a sobering counterpoint to the Feynman myth for people whose view comes from Surely You're Joking.
Linked whenever year numbering or the Holocene calendar comes up as the accessible introduction to the idea.
Recommended as high-quality physics communication and as an introduction to Noether and energy non-conservation in cosmology.
HN commenters bring it up as a good related watch in any thread about fallout, nuclear tests or detecting hidden events through indirect evidence.
HN commenters recommend it as an entertaining account of how easily fake papers get published and of problems in academic peer review.
HN commenters recommend it for changing how they think about distributions and for showing how criticality shows up across earthquakes, wildfires and other fields.
HN recommends it for Feynman's intuitive explanations and his joy in understanding how things work.
HN recommends it as an informative review of the academic publishing business and its monopoly-like structure.
Frequently linked as an in-depth, well-presented skeptical take whenever Loeb's alien claims come up.
HN uses it in debates on video-based teaching and how confronting misconceptions helps learning, though some find its Khan Academy critique flawed.
Recommended as a vivid visual demonstration of how unreliable p-values are.
HN returns to it in discussions of algorithmic feeds, misinformation and parasocial relationships, as a clear and thoughtful talk.
HN points to her videos as a counterpoint to popular dark matter discussion, framing it as the discrepancy that needs explaining.
Recommended as a clear demonstration of confirmation bias and the value of trying to break your own hypothesis.
Recommended as a lucid, insightful lecture on the limits of human knowledge and the study of mind, one commenter calling it among the best lectures ever.
Recommended as a good primer on what IQ scores mean and their limited effect on life outcomes.
HN points to it in discussions of antidepressant efficacy, the serotonin model and the power of placebos.
HN recommends it as the boring, convincing debunking of the Gofast, FLIR and Gimbal videos, which commenters say ended UFO hype for them.
HN quotes it as the crispest statement of what science is, usually when a theory clashes with evidence.
Mentioned as a fun and impressive Feynman documentary, though the mentions are brief.
Recommended as a short, fun introduction to micromorts and thinking about risk.
HN points to it as a short, tight introduction to Deutsch's idea of hard-to-vary explanations.
HN commenters recommend the two-part Kurzgesagt pair as an engaging, accessible introduction to the Fermi paradox and the Great Filter.
Cited constantly when discussing explaining to non-experts, the limits of explanation and what a 'why' question really asks.
Recommended as one of the most accessible introductions to PCR and its history.
It is the standard reference whenever a thread turns to rote labels versus real understanding.
HN cites it for Dyson's contrarian take on global warming and soil carbon.
HN recommends it as an accessible demonstration of how anyone can collect micrometeorites at home.
Recommended by some as a provocative critique of scientific dogma, and also cited as the talk TED pulled.
HN users cite it in threads about academia, grant incentives, fraud and women-only programs, often as an eye-opening personal take.
Linked as a rebuttal when Lustig's or similar influencer nutrition claims come up.
Recommended as an accessible but not oversimplified explanation of the muon g-2 experiment, by a channel aimed at curious physics enthusiasts.
HN recommends it as a decent, entertaining summary of Lilly's life and work whenever dolphin communication research comes up.
HN uses it to illustrate Feynman's wry view of philosophical questions and perception.
HN people recommend it as a short, contextualizing explainer on declining crop nutrient density.
Recommended as a gripping account of scientific fraud and the history of cloning research.
The reference people reach for when debating how math differs from physics.
HN commenters recommend it for the Gell-Mann amnesia framing and as a skeptical take on Michio Kaku.
Linked in diversity-in-tech threads as a personal, thoughtful answer on systemic barriers for minorities and women in science.
HN uses it as a reference for epistemic humility and how wrong even the smartest people have been.
HN uses it as a reference in threads on physics theories, models and what real understanding means.
HN returns to it as a reminder to stay humble and as a source of Feynman's view on awards and prestige.
Cited in threads about science funding and trust in research as an angry insider critique of academic incentives, though some commenters doubt it.
Pointed to as an accessible introduction to intuition pumps as thinking tools, and shared in remembrance after Dennett's death.
HN people link it as a short, accessible summary of Judea Pearl-style causal inference when someone repeats that correlation cannot imply causation.
Mostly used as a critical source on how popular science channels may be shaped by billionaire funding.
HN points to it as a takedown of AI-assisted amateur physics, though a few commenters push back on it.
HN cites it when discussing how math should be learned and taught, and why physics isn't built from axioms.
HN links it as an approachable interview with a working astronomer who is also a Jesuit, whenever the Vatican Observatory or science and religion comes up.
Pointed to in discussions about engaging with fringe beliefs and distrust of institutions rather than dismissing people.
Reached for whenever a thread touches on naming versus actually understanding something.
Cited in modeling and machine learning threads as the classic story on overfitting and justifying parameters.
HN commenters use it as the go-to debunking of the Navy UFO videos, though one commenter also praises it as entertaining.
Cited to support the view that human progress comes from networks and social learning.
Cited in discussions of the scientific method and empiricism as Feynman's classic analogy of watching a game to infer its rules.
Cited as a source for the idea that open-ended search can beat objective-driven optimization, though one commenter found parts of it fluffy.
HN links it when discussing mouse-study reliability and reproducibility.
Linked in microplastics and recycling threads as a debunking of a viral statistic.
HN mentions it only critically, as a rebuttal to Hossenfelder when her credibility is questioned.
HN commenters use the quote as shorthand in arguments about abstractions, standing on others' work and the limits of building from scratch.
Cited whenever a discussion turns to how hard it is to answer "why" questions or what counts as an explanation.
HN uses it as the standard debunking to cite whenever a new water-from-air device is announced.
HN commenters cite it for its portrait of Feynman as a warm person, his anecdotes and his last days.
HN commenters cite it as the source of the known/unknown unknowns framing, sometimes noting he was unfairly ridiculed for it.
HN cites it in threads on psychology replication and weak research as Feynman's critique of pseudo science.
HN cites it for details on resveratrol's unreplicated original study and the related corporate deal.
HN cites it when debating Kurzgesagt's credibility and its corrections and removals of earlier content.
HN cites it as a warning and a debunking whenever water-from-air or similar crowdfunded gadgets appear.
Used as a critical reference to argue gravity energy storage is impractical, not as a general recommendation.
HN mentions it as an example of a prominent creator publicly correcting a popular myth, and of the fire brigade myth itself.
Which of these have you already seen?
Connect YouTube and HackerTube AI hides what you've watched and ranks the rest for you.