Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism
Why Hacker News recommends it
HN cites it as the classic example of an interviewer misrepresenting a guest, though opinions on who came out better differ.
What it is
Channel 4 News's full interview with Jordan Peterson, in which Cathy Newman presses him on the gender pay gap, patriarchy, campus protests and postmodernism. It was widely discussed for its confrontational style.
Recommended by 5 HN commenters across 5 different months, 2018 to 2023.
What Hacker News said
Strong rec josephg · 2018-01 · on “The curious star appeal of Jordan Peterson”
I think "watch X destroy Y" is just youtube's version of clickbait. I suspect you'll find videos like that tailored to most groups on youtube. I sometimes use them as trailers for longer talks that I might enjoy - although I always feel a little guilty for encouraging this sort of thing. In this case I found their interview to be excellent viewing. She was harsh and honest with him, and hurled most of the standard criticism at Peterson that people talk about. And while doing that she gave him the time and opportunity to respond. And he stayed calm, considered, articulate and entertaining throughout. I don't agree with everything either of them said, but I enjoyed watching that interview imme
Recommends air7 · 2018-02 · on “Fired Google Engineer Loses Diversity Memo Challenge”
I've recently encounter Jordan Peterson. He speaks very eloquently about topics such as gender differences from (IMO) a rational and scientific point of view. I'm linking an interview with him which I find fascinating: Both for the information he conveys and for the manner in which he manages to remain cool and clear-headed against a very aggressive interviewer. [this video]
Recommends dkoubsky · 2018-03 · on “Male and female bosses share the same “classically masculine” personality traits”
Jordan Peterson talked about this in his infamous Cathy Newman interview. I think it's worth a watch: [this video]
Recommends cm2187 · 2018-12 · on “Top Patreon creators launching an alternate crowdfunding platform”
Well they occasionally debate with each others but aren't supporting the same ideas. They do have in common that they disagree with identity politics, and as you can tell from the name calling on this HN page, this is a topic on which for many there is zero tolerance for any disagreement. Peterson mostly discusses religion (from a philosophical point of view), self-improvement, identity politics. He tends to be more on the conservative side but outside of identity politics doesn't discuss politics that much. His videos are all on his youtube channel [1]. A good way to make your own opinion is to watch the channel 4 interview, which I think is the way many people discovered him [2] Harris is
Recommends hombre_fatal · 2023-09 · on “Farms that create habitat key to food security and biodiversity”
"So we should X?" is usually a signal that you're about to not track/engage with what someone said. I'm reminded of Cathy Newman's interview of Jordan Peterson where her only retort the whole time was "So you're saying that <something he didn't say>." ( [this video] -- A classic, even if you don't like the guy) For example, they are talking about cows we farm into existence at the tune of 1.5 billion global population, not a few million wild animals.
Cites hashberry · 2018-01 · on “What’s So Dangerous About Jordan Peterson?”
Jordan Peterson became famous after a student tried to debate him about his "Nazi followers" and gender pronouns: [LINK] Many people see him as an enemy because of his conservative viewpoints. His most recent debate with Cathy Newman from three days ago: [this video]
Cites nouveaux · 2018-01 · on “What’s So Dangerous About Jordan Peterson?”
Jordan Peterson is on record saying he would use preferred pronouns. He is opposed to the law and regulation of these pronouns: [this video] 23m16s is where he states he would use preferred pronouns.
Cites guitarbill · 2018-01 · on “The curious star appeal of Jordan Peterson”
BTW, that Spectator article basically just embeds the original interview on Channel 4 uploaded to YouTube: [this video] And, wow, I just watched this and it is horrendously cringeworthy. Seems like the presenter was expecting someone soft in the head (like an MP/politician), and approached the interview in that modern British fashion, which didn't work out well at all. It's really awkward to see somebody be that badly intellectually outclassed, but then it was Channel 4... On the other hand, coming back to OP, there's something encouraging about a critical thinker having "star appeal". I think that's the best way to describe Dr Peterson, as you don't have to agree with him, but it is easy to foll