Cited repeatedly to rebut 'just don't use Facebook' arguments and to explain why tracking becomes hard to escape at critical mass.
Topics › Systems, Networks & Security
The best privacy, surveillance & cybercrime videos, according to Hacker News
144 videos about privacy, surveillance & cybercrime that Hacker News commenters keep pointing each other to, ranked by how many separate months they were recommended. Part of Systems, Networks & Security.
The standard link when VPN marketing comes up, as a clear debunking of the scare tactics behind VPN ads.
HN reaches for it in every identity theft and data breach thread as the clearest, most enjoyable short explainer of why SSNs make bad identifiers.
Praised as a charismatic, engaging talk with practical security lessons, like why credit cards protect you better than debit cards.
HN treats it as the go-to talk on OPSEC and pseudonymity, recommended in threads about Tor, Silk Road and staying anonymous online.
Cited over and over as an important talk, with commenters borrowing its ideas on cheap surveillance, offense-favoring security and liability.
HN returns to it constantly as a prescient talk, cited whenever threads cover DRM, locked-down devices, app verification or restrictions on running your own software.
It is the usual cite for why good OPSEC is so hard, including entry and exit point correlation and digital exhaust.
HN recommends it as an accessible overview of the data broker industry in privacy discussions.
It is HN's go-to reference whenever device lockdown, DRM, or restrictions on installing software come up, with commenters noting how prescient it was.
HN commenters cite it whenever engagement-optimizing feeds, micro-targeting or ad infrastructure come up, as an accessible warning about algorithmic amplification.
HN repeatedly recommends it whenever fake deaths, identity verification or records fraud come up, praising how easy the attack seemed.
HN points to it as the best way to explain to ordinary people why privacy and mass surveillance matter.
HN commenters use it as a short, accessible primer on social credit and surveillance-driven gamification, linking it in many privacy and China threads.
Offered as an accessible, well-made explainer to share in threads on scam texts, crypto fraud and scam compounds.
HN returned to it repeatedly, especially after Heartbleed, as an eye-opening argument about subverting open source and standards.
HN commenters call it one of the best, most unbiased explanations of what actually happened to Mt. Gox and its missing coins.
HN treats it as the go-to overview of Flock's problems, and cites it in nearly every Flock thread.
Recommended as a forceful statement of the privacy case, though some commenters found its tone elitist and politically charged.
HN commenters hold it up as one of the most engaging tech talks ever given, both for its identity ideas and its slide technique.
Recommended as a first-hand account from NSA whistleblowers, often linked in surveillance and Snowden threads.
HN recommends it, and Jordan's wider Flock series, as a well-documented look at the poor security of these surveillance cameras.
HN points to it as an entertaining and informative explanation of the economics of reshipping and stolen-card resale scams.
HN reaches for it constantly as evidence of Apple's long-standing privacy stance and as a yardstick for judging Apple, Facebook and others.
Strongly recommended as a formative talk on privacy, especially for its argument that voting with your feet fails as a privacy strategy.
HN commenters strongly recommend it as a thoughtful talk on tech worker ethics that has not aged.
HN commenters call it an entertaining, complementary philosophical take on surveillance, with a funny story about jamming secret police.
HN recommends it as the foundational talk behind FreedomBox and the case against centralized web services.
HN commenters use it as a short, persuasive primer to send to non-technical people in debates over encryption backdoors and decryption legislation.
HN people recommend it for a first-hand view of how Tor holds up in practice, from someone who had to rely on it.
HN points to it to show that most Tor busts came from poor operational security by the user rather than a flaw in Tor itself.
HN points to it as the company's own pitch, used in debates about data-driven manipulation and extrapolated to today's AI.
HN people recommend it as a clear explanation of encrypted messaging challenges and of the thinking behind Signal.
Recommended as a non-technical, concrete case study of how metadata and phone records expose covert operations.
It is a repeat pick in 'favorite tech talk' threads as a funny, eye-opening look at how easily physical security and people can be bypassed.
Recommended as a documentary telling the early hacking and spy-hunting story, with the original people involved.
HN people cite it to show even technical users fall for phishing and that hardware security keys are the real fix.
Recommended as a practical talk on privacy and anonymity options, including diskless laptops running Tails.
HN cites it as first-hand, independent reporting on Xinjiang that does not rely on state-sanctioned access.
Offered as a satisfying example of fighting back against scam call centers.
Commenters call it one of the game's best dialogues and bring it up in discussions of mass surveillance.
HN recommends it as a gripping look at what nation-state attackers can do, used as the primary source in threads about iPhone security and Kaspersky.
HN recommends it as a good long debate for the recurring question of whether Orwell or Huxley was right.
Cited as an early, prescient warning about algorithmic personalization, echo chambers and social media feeds.
HN commenters point to Kitboga as an entertaining, righteous example of wasting scammers' time.
HN commenters cite it as a compelling demonstration that metadata identifies people, and as a great watch on sloppy CIA tradecraft.
Commenters recommend it as an entertaining, accessible explanation of how bad the law is, including for non-technical audiences.
HN users cite it as primary-source testimony, especially for the argument that weakening encryption is security versus security, not privacy versus security.
HN points to it as the primary evidence of what Cambridge Analytica was willing to do, especially in Facebook data scandal threads.
HN users recommend Moglen as a brilliant speaker and a top introduction to free software philosophy, and cite this talk in privacy and crypto-wars discussions.
Cited in threads about search bias, election influence and big-tech data practices as the most comprehensive video of Epstein's research.
Brought up in smart TV complaint threads as a real-world 'dumb display' alternative.
HN points to it in discussions of salary transparency as a short, well-sourced overview of how public tax records work in Nordic countries.
HN points newcomers to it as the thing to watch before tackling uBlock Origin's advanced mode and filter syntax.
Recommended as a rare insider look at Apple's security architecture and the reasoning behind its hardware choices.
Recommended as an entertaining talk showing that targeting software projects and introducing bugs is nothing new.
HN points to it as a deep dive into the surveillance features of North Korea's OS and the extent of that state's digital tracking.
Cited in decentralization and federation debates as the key talk on the practical challenges, though some found it defeatist.
HN lists it among favorite nerdy documentaries and enjoys hearing Stoll tell the story himself.
HN mentions it as an example of Lenny, the telemarketer time-waster, and of how a canned script can fool callers for a long time.
The go-to short, accessible explainer for mains hum forensics, linked whenever recording authenticity or timestamps come up.
Recommended as a fascinating and still relevant look at the physical footprint of government secrecy.
Offered as a concise summary of the economics and manipulation behind social media addiction in Facebook-related threads.
HN points to it as a fascinating inside look at how Indian scam call centres operate, often when scams come up in discussion.
HN cites it, and the scent-sample scene in the film, in threads about surveillance and Stasi methods such as smell registers.
Linked as the clearest technical explainer of differential privacy and the census, and of why aggregate data can still compromise privacy.
HN cites it for Lanier's ideas on the circle of empathy and paying people whose data and work train AI.
HN points to it as in-depth independent coverage of Flock license-plate cameras and their security and surveillance problems.
Cited in encryption policy threads as a funny, accessible primer and for its fake Apple ad.
HN points to it as the go-to explanation of how police can identify anyone through relatives' DNA tests, in privacy and genetics threads.
Cited in discussions of open firmware and trust as a thorough reverse engineering of the PSP.
HN cites it as the foundational demonstration that SS7 is insecure, relevant to arguments about SMS-based two-factor authentication.
Pointed to as a true-crime story of cybercrime investigation, usually in passing.
HN cites it, often critically, as Nix openly describing data-driven manipulation and targeting methods.
Cited as a vivid demonstration of the scale of Chinese state surveillance, especially in TikTok and privacy debates.
HN points to it as a worrying but technically solid explanation of how cell interception works, even if the talk is old.
HN commenters cite it as the classic demonstration of audio recovery from video in surveillance and privacy discussions.
Cited in discussions of cryptocurrency, KYC/AML and financial surveillance as a framing of money as a tool of control.
HN cites it as the key piece of evidence that intelligence officials misled Congress, and as a reported breaking point for Snowden.
Pointed to as an interesting look inside how consumer DNA testing companies process samples.
Cited in discussions of platform manipulation and eroding institutional trust, though mentions are mostly passing references.
HN mentions it in robocall and scam threads as an entertaining look at how phone scams work and how vigilantes fight back.
Cited as an easy-to-understand framing of trusted computing and TPMs as tools that can treat users as threats.
Cited as a concrete demonstration of how fake local business listings on Google Maps are used for scams.
Used as an example of how effectively internet sleuths can geolocate someone from small details, in privacy and open-source-intelligence discussions.
Referenced as a fictional illustration of AI-assisted tools and non-visual interfaces.
HN commenters post it whenever surveillance or social-media privacy stories seem to confirm the joke, noting how prescient it looks.
Cited in privacy and surveillance threads as a thoughtful treatment of being compelled to share data and the nothing-to-hide argument.
Cited in privacy and surveillance threads as an early argument for personal servers and decentralization.
HN points to it as an intuitive explanation of how NIST standardized a backdoored generator.
HN points to it as a prescient talk that discussed, in 2012, much of what Snowden's leaks later confirmed.
HN cites it as a vivid illustration of where automated enforcement, digital ID and crowd-sourced policing could lead.
Posted as a joke or satire whenever a company sells out its users or surveillance comes up.
Mostly cited as the source of the Krebs critique of Cloudflare and Prince's onstage response, which commenters debate.
Cited in threads about phones listening for ads as an anecdotal demonstration, though other commenters doubt it.
HN invokes it as a joke or reference whenever voice cloning or voice authentication comes up.
HN cites it as a quick introduction to why Intel ME is a trust problem for anyone worried about hardware-level access.
HN cites Binney's testimony in debates about NSA domestic surveillance.
Referenced as a concrete example of how weak Google Maps listing verification enables phone fraud and impersonation.
HN uses it as the go-to reference whenever a story involves ad tracking, facial recognition or personalized billboards.
HN cites it in Monero and Zcash debates as a critique of decoy-based privacy and its passive and active attacks.
HN mostly cites it ironically, as evidence of Microsoft's earlier privacy marketing against Google that sits awkwardly with its later telemetry.
HN cites it as the source of the quote and as a critical example of the nothing-to-hide attitude toward privacy.
HN commenters cite it as the canonical example of an intelligence official lying to Congress under oath without consequence.
HN uses it as a critical reference to contrast his campaign promises with later NSA surveillance policy.
Cited as a visual reference in discussions of social credit, surveillance and facial recognition in China, usually with a dystopian framing.
HN commenters cite it, mostly critically toward GrapheneOS, as the source for the CalyxOS side of the dispute.
Cited as a vivid demonstration of how much personal data is findable and shared online, in privacy and tracking threads.
Used as a pop-culture analogy for mass surveillance technology that now looks plausible.
HN commenters cite it to contrast Apple's stated privacy stance with its later practices or to show Jobs's view on user control of data.
Cited in surveillance and facial or gait recognition threads for tradecraft such as putting a pebble in the shoe.
Used purely as a joke or meme when threads touch on tracking and surveillance.
HN mostly cites it as a humorous or illustrative reference to an extreme COPPA penalty.
Mostly cited critically, as Apple's own defense of its scanning plans, which commenters found out of touch or unconvincing; one commenter says it adds nuance.
HN cites it critically as an example of corporate apology marketing that rang hollow, and as a TV ad using gray placeholder rectangles.
HN cites it as a glimpse of how Google and other data companies think about behavioral sequencing and data collection.
Cited in surveillance threads as a concrete example of persistent wide-area aerial surveillance that already existed in 2013.
HN cites it as evidence that knowing an iPhone passcode is enough to take over an Apple account.
Commenters cite it as a primary source for Cook's own words on Apple's privacy stance and on how iCloud data is handled in China.
Cited as a cautionary example that even security-savvy people can be phished, especially in threads about hacked or terminated channels.
Which of these have you already seen?
Connect YouTube and HackerTube AI hides what you've watched and ranks the rest for you.